Urgently Addressing Immorality - Part L

Everyone directly associated with the expression of power in a corrupt organisation is, by definition, either deliberately corrupt themselves or utterly ignorant of morality.  Such people may even be dangerously ignorant of history.

Perhaps you regard morality as a joke.

Perhaps you regard history as a joke.

Perhaps you regard danger as a joke.

You may regard anything as a joke if you believe it does not affect you personally.

Perhaps you regard the infliction of pain as a joke.

Perhaps you regard death as a joke. 

How do you compare jokes?

How do you compare ancient Egyptian pottery with ancient Greek pottery?

 

 

How do you compare an ancient Egyptian temple with a 19th century English flax mill?

What do you know about the history of Egyptian temples and English flax mills more generally?

What do you know about Egyptian Revival architecture?

What is your acquaintance with various obelisks? 

What is your acquaintance with the history of manual work?

How will you compare the 2040s with the 1840s and the 1940s?

Perhaps you regard the desire for a living wage to be immoral, especially if you have plenty of financial resources set aside for emergency situations and/or the funding of your leisure preferences and/or fashion preferences.

How do you usually assess morality in relation to industries?

How do you usually assess morality in relation to political movements, such as Chartism?

What are your assumptions about history, morality, industry, political reform and social movements? 

As an ordinary member of the global public, you currently have only a very brief chance to learn about the work of the Revolutionary Climatological Needlepoint Committee.

What do you already know about the approach of the committee towards addressing immorality with the urgency the task requires?

Perhaps you are yet to acquaint yourself with the official introduction to the practice:

 


Perhaps you regard yourself mainly as a producer of documentary studies rather than as a maker of a better world.

What is the purpose of any documentation process, and from whose point of view?

Perhaps you are mostly interested in infotainment, not better governments.

Perhaps your idea of orderliness is another person's idea of mediocrity, or even chaos.

Perhaps your idea of being tidy is another person's idea of being wasteful. 

Perhaps you idea of saving energy is another person's idea of discomfort.

Perhaps your idea of fashion is another person's idea of being ridiculous.

When have documentary films helped to improve the world, or make it worse? 

When have television documentaries helped to improve the world, or make it worse?

When has documentary photography, including social documentary photography helped to improve the world, or made it worse?

How do you define the meaning and purpose of any document?

How do you attempt to interpret the meanings of various documents, and with which knowledge and skills do you do so?

How do you compare the Temple of Edfu with Abu Simbel?

How do you compare the work of John Beasley Greene with the work of Francis Frith?

What have been your experiences of encountering aspects of history, whether emotionally, intellectually, morally or politically?

You may have discovered much through museums of one sort or another.

You may have discovered much through reading, or through taking part in archaeological digs.

What have you discovered about the history of narcissism?

What have you discovered about the responsibility for maintaining societal and natural order?

What is your acquaintance with integrity?

How do you compare trade unions with benefit societies, charitable organisations, industry bodies, corporate groups, government departments and philanthropic communities? 

How do you compare organisations, and other structures, from the outside and inside, and over which timescale?

How well do you contribute to political pleasantness, anywhere at all, and how do you know?

Where, if anywhere, have you been investing in improving political practices?

How do you assess the appropriateness or otherwise of organisational structures?

How do you assess whether any sort of hierarchy is appropriate or not? 

How much time do you spend each week examining value systems and belief systems, and where, and for what purpose? 

How and when and where do you think about systems more generally, particularly in relation to the harmonious interplay of beauty, understanding and magnificence?

How do you assess the appropriateness or otherwise of nonlinear systems?

What are your talents in relation to addressing scarcity?

How do you know you are investing in the community sphere wisely?

How do you know you are investing in the private sphere wisely?  

How do you know you are investing in the biosphere wisely?

How do you know you are investing in the atmosphere of the Earth wisely?

Comments

Post a Comment