Urgently Addressing Immorality - Part O

What is your knowledge of political puppets and potential political puppets?

Perhaps you think clones, holograms, robots and finger puppets would be better heads of state, and heads of governments, than the usual occupants of those positions, with or without regard for genetic considerations. 

How do you usually reflect upon the structures of societies and the ways in which they are systematically or unsystematically governed?

Investing in enlightened productivity requires a considerable knowledge of history, and science.

Yet no amount of knowledge, from anyone's mind or library or archive or art collection is likely to be of any long-term use whatsoever unless considerably knowledgeable, adequately competent, non-corrupt governments consistently act appropriately and other types of governments do not exist at all.

Nature must always be treated with caution and respect.
 
That is why humans and human nature must be treated with caution and respect. 
 
But what does respect mean in practice, in your experience?
 

How have you measured the success of that planning in terms of productivity?

How carefully have you been investing in exploration, and for what purposes?

How are you investing in security?

What do you know about opportunism in terms of purported productivity?

What do you know about political opportunism in relation to the development and implementation of inappropriate constitutional law?

What do you know about similarities and differences between political opportunism, intellectual opportunism, spiritual opportunism, sexual opportunism, legal opportunism and economic opportunism? How can you prove you are not an opportunist of any sort? 

How does an understanding of history help or hinder your productivity?

What do you know about the history of government preferences for measuring productivity mainly in terms of greed?

Perhaps you measure your investments, and your productivity, in terms of goodness and/or wellness. 

How do you usually assess productivity in relation to diplomacy?

How have you already attempted to improve the world community?

How are you investing in thoughtful reciprocity at present?

Self-serving politicians and their greedy puppeteers cannot be trusted to respect reasonable freedom of expression, or any other real freedom, especially on political issues.

Nor can self-serving media personnel be trusted, or any other self-serving persons for that matter. 

How do you know whether continuity is healthy or not?

How have you assessed the quality of your long-term, personal relationships? 

Stability is necessary for sustainability to be possible.

Without an adequate commitment to healthy continuity, sustainability is impossible.

How, then, do you decide whether efforts towards continuing a process are worthwhile or not?

What have you discovered about cruel decisions made within bureaucracies?

What have you discovered about conflicts in various parts of the world and why they seem impossible to address?

How are you addressing climate change?

How are you addressing poor standards of hygiene?

How are you addressing corruption?

How are you addressing organised crime, including the parts of it organised through financial institutions? 

Do any politicians, anywhere in the world, adequately understand the meaning of suitable independence, appropriate interdependence and vulnerable dependence?

Is there a government, anywhere in the world, adequate devoted to supporting suitably simple living and appropriately good relationships, for the benefit of everyone? 

Developing new, unproblematic cultures is an urgent task.

What do you prefer to do when a structural fix is urgently required?

What do you know about productivity in relation to urgency, particularly when investing in improved constitutions, directly and indirectly?

What are you doing to prevent the greedy destruction of relatively sustainable communities?

What are you doing to prevent other aggressively exploitative practices?

What do you know about the exploitation of labour?

How has your life been a product of history?

What do you know about the end-of-history illusion?

You may or may not be capable of investing in importantly useful information with a suitable sense of urgency. 

How do you know when one government is better than another?

How do you know when methods of governance can be improved quite easily? 
 
What do you know about political control?

How have you been investing in reasonableness over the past decade or so, and where is your evidence?  

How have you been investing in the public sphere over the past decade or so, and where is your evidence? 

What do you know about politics?

What do you know about corruption?

What is your acquaintance with political scandals and other scandals?    

And what do you know about intelligent frugality and other qualities associated with real philanthropy?
 
What do you know about enlightened philanthropy, and how do you know it?

What do you believe to be the place of enlightenment in politics and government, and why? 

Good governments would continually be involved in investing in good policy and other good practices. 

They would be investing in mutually beneficial pleasantness appropriately, hence in the public interest.

They would be investing in peacefully authentic living sustainably.

How can you be sure you are investing in a sensible approach to sustainability?

What do you know about conflicts of interest?

What is your approach to investing in freedom in relation to investing in life?

What do you know about the history of self-coups and other coups, insurrections, plots and conspiracies?

What is your acquaintance with the Gunpowder Plot?

Comments