Urgently Addressing Immorality - Part D

The Revolutionary Climatological Needlepoint Committee wishes to ensure you are well informed, particularly about politics.

If you happen to be well-informed about anything else, particularly a topic detested by self-serving politicians, please be aware that there are likely to be unpleasant consequences when you attempt to correct misinformation, and especially disinformation.

If you are well-informed about politics, you will be aware of the facts of the matter very well indeed.  You may also be quite well aware of the flax of the matter.

There is still much work to do to address immorality properly before the end of this month.

Do you usually wear linen or wool or cotton or silk or leather or fur or fossil products?

Perhaps you prefer to wear nothing at all, even in inclement weather.

Upon what do you usually sit, squat, recline, lie down or kneel down, if able to do so?

How do you tell whether a principle is appropriately humane?
 
How do you tell whether a policy is appropriately humane?
 
How do you tell whether a practice is appropriately humane?

How do you assess the reasonableness, or unreasonableness, or any sort of competitiveness?

What are your policies as a patron?
 
How clearly do you distinguish between your philanthropy and your patronage?
 
What do you already know about political philanthropy and enlightened patronage?

If you believe you are urgently addressing immorality, how do you forecast your successes in that regard, and how far into the distance?

What is your acquaintance with weather forecasts?

What is your acquaintance with economic forecasts?

What do you know about the overconfidence effect?

What is your acquaintance with fashion forecasts?

What is your acquaintance with political forecasts?

What do you know about public diplomacy and the associated propaganda?

What is your acquaintance with epidemiological forecasts?

What is your acquaintance with ecological forecasts?

What is your acquaintance with interpersonal forecasts?

Perhaps you mostly associate forecasts with broadcasts and/or divination and/or scientific models and/or advertising campaigns.

How do you usually think about beauty in relation to enlightened benevolence?
 
How do you usually think about understanding in relation to enlightened benevolence?
 
How do you usually think about magnificence in relation to enlightened benevolence, and from whose point of view?
 
How do you usually think about harmony in relation to enlightened benevolence?

The problem, in many parts of the world, is that far too many people feel forced to behave unethically in order to acquire money, or to stay in a job, or to protect themselves and/or their families from harm.

How do you attempt to defend yourself?

How do you attempt to prevent yourself from being unethical?

How do you acquire money?

If you manage to save money, how do you prefer to invest it, and why?

What have you discovered, by now, about democracy and the revolution?

How do you assess morality and immorality in relation to democracy?

How do you assess morality and immorality in relation to the concept of revolution?

What do you know about censorship?

What do you know about freedom of the press?

How do you compare religious works of art with the brutality of battle?

What do you know about wars of aggression and wars of succession?

What do you know about overly powerful ideologues, religious fanatics and stupidly opinionated celebrities?

What do you know about megalomaniac media moguls and their sensationalist and selfish agendas?

What do you know about propaganda and other forms and sources of misinformation?

What do you know about other attacks on informed public opinion?

How do you attempt to distance yourself from unseemly squabbles?

How do you attempt to hold the instigators of squabbles to account?

What do you know about political symbolism and the disputes associated with it? 

How do you distinguish between political myth and political reality?

And how can you be sure you are preparing properly for COP26 through climate courtesy credentials?

Comments